Antikeimenos [5]
Structural analysis of the eschatological scenario, the "antichrist calendar", the morphology of the end of the world
Structural analysis of the eschatological scenario, the "antichrist calendar", the morphology of the end of the world
For Hinduism, the cyclic pattern is as follows. There is the night of Brahma and the day of Brahma. During Brahma's night period the world does not exist, while during the day period it does. Since Brahma is eternal, his days and nights do not follow one another but coexist, expressing his two aspects - the unrevealed and the manifested - Saguna Brahman, Saguna Brahman (Brahma with qualities) and Nirguna Brahman, Nirguṇa Brahman (Brahma without qualities). Each day of Brahma (mahakalpa) contains 1000 kalpas. Each kalpa has 14 manvantars - 7 manvantars of departure and 7 manvantars of return. In each manvantar there are 4 yugas (satya yuga, treta yuga, dvapara yuga and kali yuga).
In all eschatological currents of Christianity, the theme of the Antichrist manifests itself in one way or another. Thus, in the Russian schism it played a fundamental role. Indicative in this respect is the statement of an Old Believer, a representative of the extreme sect of the 'Vagabonds' (a follower of the famous 'runner' Antipas Yakovlev):
What is the semiotic structure of Traditionalism, i.e. of Tradition - or, if you like, of the 'primordial tradition'? This structure represents, with respect to specific traditions, a kind of meta-language that generalises the paradigmatic properties of specific traditions as specific languages. That is, we are dealing with a generalising set of signs, which we can try to ascribe to the field of the signifier.
The purpose of this article is to examine the figure of "the Antichrist" and the semantic field of "the end of times" without reference to any one particular religious tradition.
With the onset of Russia’s vast military operation on the territory of Ukraine, the whole world entered a decisive phase of its history. And just as history is not a mechanical, implacable and fatalistic unfolding of events without meaning and finality, remaining open to infinity of options and properties, determined by the divine will, the end of this major battle is an uncertain one.
Progressive liberals have developed hypocritical duplicity into a fine art, and this is one of the reasons why traditionalists and conservatives will so often lose in the arena when faced with liberal methodology.
William Henry Trescot of South Carolina was a well-respected historian and civil servant in the 19th century. He was also an ardent Southern nationalist.
No people can live in the past, not even in its own past. But if it no longer has a link with its history, it must of necessity perish. Persian [history is] crowded with hardship and glory, ordeals and hopes.
A Critique of Olavo de Carvalho's Work in tandem with a Refutation of Western Logocentrism