Remember the law of risk preservation

One of the major events that has happened to mankind in the last 30 years is the direct encounter with a qualitatively new phenomenon called the ‘law of risk conservation’. Of course, this is not a classical law in the natural-scientific sense of this term: there are practically no such laws in social development, but a conclusion based on accumulated empirical observations.

Its meaning is simple: minimizing the individual risks of separate elements of the system does not destroy these risks, but raises them to the level of the entire system, where they ultimately destroy the system itself.

Strictly speaking, this is one of the mechanisms of realization of the fundamental laws of dialectics: the transition of quantity into quality and the negation of negation.

We saw the realization of this law in 2006-2008 in the US stock market, where the derivatives system made the risks of investors in first-class corporate bonds an order of magnitude, i.e. about ten times, lower than the risks of the companies issuing those bonds.

This was an extraordinary victory of social intelligence and technology. Individual risks were minimized, the overall risk potential was lowered to the systemic level, and then the system collapsed right before our eyes as we rejoiced at it.

This law manifests itself in other, very different areas.

We see it in pedagogy, where the desire to protect children from danger generates the infantilization of entire generations. Soviet literature once described ‘ambivalent men’ who were unable to make decisions or even assess what was happening, before their weakness and cowardice destroyed their country.

Today, in developed countries, we see politicians unable to recognize an uncomfortable reality for the same reason. We see masses of ordinary people who refuse to recognize what is happening to them because they are uncomfortable with such recognition - and we see masses of men who categorically refuse to start a family for fear of the responsibilities. In Germany, more than 30 per cent of men under 40 do so.

By increasing the comfort of everyday life, men reduce the small individual risks, which are not even related to the dangers, but only to the inconveniences - and in the end they are faced with the modern white woman of the developed world, who refuses to give birth for the sake of consumption and thus puts a fat cross on the entire Western civilization.

By depriving their peoples of the ability to question their leadership and thus destroying their ability to think about their own development, they lead them to defeat in the competition with peoples who have retained this ability.

Similar processes are observed in medicine: in developed countries, for more than three generations, children have been systematically saved who, without medical help, would not have lived to the age of 18.

From a purely biological point of view, this triumph of humanism and technology is called the deterioration of the gene pool - and in many developed countries this deterioration is clearly visible in the streets, on the faces of local residents.

There is nothing we can or want to do about it: we will remain human and save the children - as many as we can - thus increasing the systemic genetic risks of the human population.

Free cheese can only be found in mousetraps - and by consistently refusing, step by step, to pay for its bits, we are all together, all of humanity, finally getting to the point where there really is plenty of it.

The realization that reducing current individual risks increases the aggregate risks of the system in which we operate will not change our lives, just as the awareness of the finitude of earthly existence does not spoil the mood of even total atheists. But it does allow us to recognize the inevitability of profound qualitative changes and to try to prepare for them in advance - as far as possible, of course.

Source: https://delyagin.ru