Almost a hundred years later, the Ottomans and Zionists are once again on the warpath

Against the backdrop of the ongoing genocide in the Gaza Strip, the inaction of Arab governments and the so-called "revolutionaries" in Damascus, Zionism is in a hurry to announce a new threat to its existence. The "Turkish axis", according to the "radical cosmopolitans", will be no worse for "Israel" than the Iranian axis. Former Knesset member Zvi Hauser quite directly outlined the concerns about Turkey's plans for Syria, stating that Ankara's goal is "the creation of a Sunni Islamic state opposed to Israel." Shmuel Rosner, a well-known analyst in Zionist circles, writes that although "Turkey is not a dangerous and extremist enemy like Iran, it is also not a state that Israel has an interest in strengthening, because its potential influence inside Syria brings it closer to Israel's borders. Recent experience shows that the Turks have no problem supporting armed groups like Hamas." David Ben-Basat, CEO of Radio 100FM, in his article notes that Turkey's presence in Syria means a "shifting balance of power" that forces Zionism to face "difficult strategic challenges." Zionists Orientalist Eyal Ziser writes that "There is no vacuum in life, and Turkey, led by Erdogan, quickly took Iran's place. Turkey's role in the new Syria will harm not only Israel, but also Jordan and other Arab countries."

Concern about Turkey's support for Hamas and the "neo-Ottoman" foreign policy in Libya, Syria and Iraq, forces Zionists to conclude that a direct conflict with Turkey is inevitable in the near future.

Separately, the Zionists have focused on Syria, where the occupiers are becoming increasingly confident that after the elimination of Kurdish separatism, the Turks and their proxies will focus on occupied Palestine. It is for this reason that from every corner of the Zionist colony there are cries of the need to support the Kurdish fighters, who in turn are only waiting for help from Zionism and the Americans. But do the Zionists limit themselves to supporting the Kurds? For example, the commanders of the Turkoman "National Syrian Army" are convinced that the "Israelis" are planning to create four states on the territory of today's Syria, and judging by the movement of terrorists from the IDF in Daraa and Quneitra, Fehim Isa's fears are well founded.

Turkey's Syrian proxies from among the Turkomans became the second to condemn the Zionists' plans and express their readiness to resist them, the first were the local Muslim Brotherhood. Why is this important? Both sides have ideological ties to Turkey, the Turkomans are more drawn to the “Islamized nationalists” - the MHP, and the Ikhwans to the AK Party. In fact, even the presence of these two highly ideological groups with a clearly pro-Palestinian rhetoric will already greatly worry the Zionists, and there are also other types of Islamic groups with different views, but a unified view of the tragedy in Palestine.

The Kurdish denouement is close to its logical conclusion, the Turks will either destroy the PKK branches themselves or force the new government to do this work. Then Ankara will simultaneously work on developing a new state structure and constitution for Syria, and in parallel the second stage of cooperation in the defense sphere will follow. Tahrir al-Sham would of course like to pursue an "independent policy", but they understand the grave consequences for themselves in the event of irritating Turkey. Therefore, Zionism is proceeding from a short period of time for the implementation of its policy inside Syria, which, in addition to occupation, consists of providing all kinds of assistance to lay the separatist foundation in a number of areas, be it the Kurdish region or the Druze region.

Turkey has already begun to establish military academies in Aleppo, Homs and Damascus, where Syrians will be trained to work with air defense. Syrian General Ahmed Osman announced the figure of "300 thousand people, when forming a new army that will have to respond to the Zionist threat." The new reality in Syria forces Zionism to react, but behind the apparent success (the destruction of the military potential of Assad's Syrian army) there is a new problem. It does not matter whether Tahrir al-Sham continues to ignore the occupation of Syrian lands and the Palestinian tragedy or changes its mind, what is important is that there are still colossal pro-Palestinian sentiments in Syria, which will certainly find themselves in the resistance to "Israel."