RECALLING A PREMEDITATED MASSACRE OF SIKHS

Nanak Singh, then a 39 year old lone survivor of premeditated massacre of Sikhs in Chati Singhpura, a village of District Anantnag in IIOJK which was orchestrated on 20 March 2000 has unveiled Indian false flag operation in a shocking tone. He told that he was a government employee in Animal Husbandry Department. He has narrated the massacre in a very horrified manner being an eyewitness raising serious questions to be answered but Indian government seems to have swathed matter of a heinous crime so far for reasons to be better understandable. While coming out from village Gurdwara Nanak and his mates saw some uniformed men with masked faces strolling around in streets.

Nanak told different reporters that he still remembered they were calling a man as ‘CO Sahab’, who was passing instructions for identification of the villagers. Later on they lined up the people ordering them to turn their faces to the wall to fire at us from the back and triggered their guns out of cold blood resulting in 35 causalities on the spot. The killers took all the measures that nobody was left alive but the Nanak however luckily survived by divine will to later expose the Indian drama to the whole world. 

I think if there would be a war between India and Pakistan they won’t use those many bullets which they used to kill our men”, Nanak explained the gravity of the massacre. They were celebrating and laughing loudly. He further added in his interviews with the reporters that executers of this planned murder were calling each other with the names Pawan, Bansi, Bahadur and then finally they left while shouting ‘Jai Hind’. In that incident “I lost my son, brother, four cousins and uncle”, Nanak told.

It has further been learnt that the Sub Inspector, Mohammad Ishaq who shifted Nanak Singh to a hospital in Srinagar was never promoted probably because he helped an eyewitness and his community sharp after the incident. The whole massacre was a conspiracy to win the sympathies of the president of US Bill Clinton over the Kashmir and it was showcased to tarnish the image of Pakistan as the US President had also a scheduled visit of Pakistan. The Indian Government never conducted any fair and consolidated probe into the matter except propagating involvement of Pakistan in the affair. That night still haunts the dwellers of the village who are seeking for justice till date. India is a hoax democracy; as there is a government of the Brahmans (upper Hindu caste), for the Brahmans and by the Brahmans which has become a nightmare for its minorities.

Pakistan condemned the killing of innocent civilians and refuted to Indian claims terming it as exploitation of a tragic situation by India with evil intentions. As a matter of fact, Pakistan could not have risked such an adventure amidst the state visit of US president to South Asian rival countries. The identity of the perpetrators remains unknown whereas Indian government asserts that the massacre was conducted by Pakistan-based militant group  LeT and the sole evidence is David Headley’s farcical statement in Indian detention whereas there are many accounts which hold Indian Army responsible for the massacre. The history of IIOJK maintains that save some random killings of Hindus by militants, Sikhs - many of whom run trucking companies in valley - had been considered neutral in the campaign to divorce Kashmir from India. Hindu villages are guarded by security patrols, but not the Sikh villages, as they felt safe from the militants.

It is therefore validated that brutal mass murder of Sikhs in Kashmir on the eve of Clinton visit was a pre-planned act of Indian intelligence to defame the Kashmiri freedom struggle. Even mujahidin commanders denied their hand in the barbarous killing of Sikhs. Survivors interviewed by journalists insisted that the perpetrators had looked and spoken "like people from South India" and had shouted pro-India slogans after the massacre. In an introduction to book written by Madeleine Albright titled The Mighty and the Almighty: Reflections on America, God, and World Affairs (2006), Hillary Clinton accused "Hindu Militants" of perpetrating the act which speaks volumes about the Indian hand in the matter. Indian agencies are very fond of such false flag operations later to put blame on Pakistan and the other powers hostile to India.

The other Indian claim to involve Pakistan in the tragic massacre is with reference to Suhail Malik’s confession in Indian custody, a nephew of banned Lashkar-e-Taiba co-founder Hafiz Muhammad Saeed authenticity of which was questioned by Barry Bearak of The New York Times. Later in the year 2011, a Delhi court cleared Malik of the charges. Many Sikh organizations have demanded a deeper state inquiry into the details of the massacre and for the inquiry to be made public but the Indian Government has shelved the matter to camouflage its connection with the killing and after lapse of 22 years the families of the victims are still looking for the justice.