The Dark Side of the Story of Javaid Rehman, Part 1

Javaid Rehman's latest report, which was published a few ago, and the name of the statement of claim is a better description for it, is a collection of lies and accusations against Iran, which are clearly intended to meet specific demands, including the demands of the terrorist group of Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK), It was written so that he could pay his respects to this group at the end of his tenure as a so-called special reporter; A group which, according to its members, is responsible for the martyrdom and killing of 17 thousand Iranian and Iraqi citizens.

This issue should not and cannot be easily ignored; before dealing with the reasons why Javaid Rehman wrote such a claim, it is necessary to look at this issue from a wider angle and with a deeper look.

The constant traces of MEK in the reports of the so-called special rapporteurs of the United Nations

A look at other alleged reports of the so-called special rapporteurs of the United Nations indicates an approach almost similar to the approach of Javaid Reman in his recent claim; this fact indicates the existence of a fixed algorithm and procedure in collecting the provisions required for the preparation of anti-Iranian reports by the so-called special rapporteurs of the United Nations on the issue of human rights in Iran; The reports are prepared with the aim of providing as a tool for political pressure and justifying the imposition of unilateral coercive measures for the western countries by citing the illusory accusations of the oppositions and the MEK at the head of them.

This procedure has led to the scandal of the so-called UN Special Rapporteurs many times by presenting authentic documents and evidence from the Islamic Republic of Iran or other channels.

For example, we can refer to the alleged reports of Ahmad Shahid (born in the Maldives and educated at the University of Queensland, Australia, and living in London) in general and specifically to his fourth report, which was a vague and undocumented report based on data received from members affiliated with terrorist groups. One of the most important features of the mentioned report, which proved its connection with terrorist groups, including the MEK, was the use of a large number of keywords favored by the MEK and other people and media opposed to Iran.

Apart from this, Ahmad Shahid's role in the field of MEK to make a criminal deal in his open and hidden meetings with the members of this terrorist group and the media photos of some of these meetings continued continuously. Providing asylum to the members of the MEK in exchange for selling false data to make a plot against Iran!

Finally, the scandal caused by these connections led to the application of serious pressure and as a result the early removal of Ahmad Shahid from the human rights structure against Iran.

Asma Jahangir (from Pakistan and educated at British universities), the so-called special rapporteur of the United Nations, also moved in the same direction; Al-Waie News website, quoting a security official, reported in May 2016 that Jahangir received a $200,000 reward from MEK and drug traffickers for taking a stand against Iran.

MEK and human rights; the ironic paradox, but loved by the West, with the aforementioned explanations, it became clear that the main and at the same time the strangest source of the reports of the so-called special reporters of the United Nations is the MEK; A terrorist group that has a record of crimes against humanity not only against the people and the country of Iran, but also against Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and even the Americans, and is known as ISIS of the time.

The case of the crimes of the terrorist group of the MEK is similar to the serious cases of international criminals, including the Zionist regime and the ISIS group; The MEK has similarities with all the criminals of the world: in genocide, infanticide and organized terror with the Zionist regime, in terrorist suicide missions with ISIS, in creating terror with various terrorist groups.

The hypocrisy of Western countries and institutions in this regard can be better understood when they welcome this terrorist group but they also warn their own people and politicians of the criminal actions of this group. For example, in September of last year, the Parliament of the European Union passed a resolution while referring to the violent actions of the terrorist group of the MEK, and announced that the elements of this group have abused European representatives and politicians with deception and misleading methods.

Javaid Rehman; The unwarranted mercenary of the Mujahedin-e Khalq

Javaid Rehman, in following his predecessors to pay tribute to the Western employers, has prepared his anti-Iranian reports with political goals based on the sources of the oppositions of Iran, especially the terrorist group of the MEK; Employers with a history of sponsoring anti-Iranian resolutions, which, ironically, the second citizenships of some of these UN reporters related to the mentioned countries that have close relations with the MEK and even host them.

Ignoring the various reports presented by Iran to international organizations and mechanisms regarding the human rights situation in the country, in his recent report, he tried to justify his use of biased data and false reports of MEK by claiming the lack of access to Iran's data.

Although these kinds of activities have been revealed for a long time and have disgraced Javaid Rehman, but in putting together pieces of the puzzle of Javaid Rehman's mission, such as the expression of satisfaction and happiness of the MEK on the extension of his mission, the presence of high-ranking members of the MEK in the meetings to present Rahman's anti-Iranian reports In the meetings of the Human Rights Council, Rehman's reference to the false reports and statistics of the MEK and of course the interview with Simaye Azadi, the main media of the terrorist group of the MEK, in the last days of his activity in the position of the so-called special rapporteur of the United Nations confirms an important and of course repeated a dark fact about him.

It is not far from the expectation that in the near future, more pictures and documentaries of Javaid Rehman's connection with the MEK and his cooperation with this terrorist group will be published and will cause more scandal for him and also for those who are responsible for appointing him as the so-called special rapporteur of the United Nations.