18+ 
The computer as a materialized expression of formalized logic, particularly with the development of social networks and their penetration into all aspects of our lives in the process of forming the “Internet of Everything”, makes people equal in access to it.
Humans unjustly occupy fifty per cent of ontology; objects must be brought back to the forefront. This demand is a central part of the philosophical school of object-oriented ontology (abbreviated as OOO). The father of this materialistic school of thought, created in 1999 (initially as object-oriented philosophy), is Graham Harman (b. 1968), an American Heideggerian philosopher strongly influenced by Quentin Meillassoux. But what is object-oriented ontology? Why does it represent the newest stage in the development of the radically immanent ideology as part of the Cybelian Logos1? And why does it form a theoretical foundation for the thought structure of transhumanism?
The process of liberation of the human individual from all traces of collective identity has reach its ultimate point. But to be human is the same as to share collective identity with other human. In the liberal individualist liberal sight it should be optional – as in the case of gender, nation, religion, race and so on. So today gay-pride – tomorrow robot-pride. This approaching moment obliges us to rethink what is human in coming years and months. If liberal individualist anthropology is right, so well – welcome to Singularity and let’s accelerate its coming.
There will be some black magic yet, and certain things that will outright petrify. I think genetic engineering – we’re only now seeing the last people; we haven’t yet seen the first post-people, which are very soon to come. These should be mutants, clones, and they aren’t just fantasies or science fiction.
©2024
18+
