We are on the central axis of the revolt
Speech by N.V. Melentieva at the presentation of the book "Eschatological Optimism" by Daria Dugina at the "Eurasian Congress of Philosophers" 17.02.2024
Speech by N.V. Melentieva at the presentation of the book "Eschatological Optimism" by Daria Dugina at the "Eurasian Congress of Philosophers" 17.02.2024
In the history of 20th century philosophy and political science, everything associated with existentialism is opposed to politics. It is the existentialism of Sartre, Camus, leftist existentialism, which serves as a basis for criticising political structures and political systems, because it is a remote response to Heidegger.
My report aims to combine three stages of Russian history: the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union, and modern Russia. There has been a lot of discussion about this over the last 9 months, and, in fact, over the last 20 years. Lances have been broken but no consensus has been reached. The Reds (the Communists were commonly called the Reds during the Soviet period) continue to hate everything that has to do with religion and the state. The Whites (those who supported the Tsar and Imperial Russia after the Revolution of 1917) continue to hate everything related to the Soviet Union and the people who lived there.
Looking at its basic principles, our Russian philosophy is historiosophy. It is multidimensional. I think that the moral dimension is the most important one, which doesn't always get the attention it deserves. It has to be said that morality in the context of the Russian ethical tradition does not mean moralism, moralising, or showing off. Ethical questioning is very often confused with moralizing and preaching. So, the ethical is often overshadowed by the moral.
As philosophers, we are expected to come up with a conceptual scheme that might work. Political strategists usually work with ready-made concepts, as do journalists and political scientists. They don't create them. This is the philosophers' job - to create concepts. By and large, they don't even have to be created from scratch, because Russian thought and the history of Russian philosophy as a whole is extremely rich. We have a lot of untapped conceptual resources that we can use to get where we need to go.
Today we have gathered to honor the late Daria Dugina and to reflect on her untimely passing. I would like to begin my talk with a short historiosophical discussion on the subject of very relevant events, the deaths, not only of Daria, but also of many others. The death last night of the first and last president of the Soviet Union was the subject of a lot of postings. Our mutual friend, the writer Vladimir Kovalenko, said that when Gorbachev died, the 20th century ended and the 21st century began. And I have had this feeling over the last six months that people who had no place in the future are really dying, people from the past are dying. The last convulsions of the modern age will be at an end. This can be seen in the example of public figures.
In the current circumstances, it is necessary first of all to see the tectonic, historical shifts, the roots of which can be traced to the beginning of the 19th century. Russian philosophy has always been involved with the world historical issues and tried to comprehend the historic events. It was abreast of the times and predicted the future. Let us try to investigate if the prophecies of Russian thinkers were fulfilled.