The feeling of hatred, quintessence of woke progressivism

What is most often talked about is what one wants to exorcise, because it disturbs and frightens, something alien and powerful that unconsciously attracts. Hatred, in the society of forced inclusion and forced tolerance, is removed and forbidden to those who do not participate in the banquet of power. No protected minorities are to be hated, but the most vicious hatred against those who oppose the dominant narrative is permitted and encouraged. The strict rules of the One Thought, woke culture and do-goodism do not allow transgressions to the prohibition of hating, as if one could repress a feeling that springs from the depths. A noble and strong feeling, the polar opposite of love with which it shares passion, the desire to possess or destroy the object loved or hated.

Son of Thanatos, the death drive, it drives to one's own and others' annihilation, just as Eros is the drive for life, libido and self-preservation. The German psychoanalyst Erich Fromm identified the Reactive Hatred, born of a deep wound that produces impotence, the perfect diagnosis for traitors to socialism. Going from defending the peoples to defending its persecutors resulted in psychic trauma, causing the exhaustion of any revolutionary drive. The guilt that devours those who betrayed triggers hatred, the expression of anger towards those who replaced them in social struggles and fought against the dictatorship of authoritarian democracy.

The reigning hypocrisy in society, defying logic and a sense of reality, imposes an absurd prohibition that is supposed to nullify the hostility and aversion present in the human soul. Like all self-respecting rules, this one too has its good exception, hatred of everything outside the coercive vision of the good is allowed without reservation. The hatred that the forces of globalization pour out on the enemy is a projection mechanism of repressed contents hidden in the Shadow, the psychic reservoir of the unpresentable. Envy for consistency and courage, anger and frustration for those who have betrayed every ideal to sell out to the highest bidder, intolerance for those who do not replace reality with fantasy.

Fear of the political opponent triggers aggression that results in physical violence, persecution, assaults on party headquarters, slander and defamation. Anti-fascist agitators in the absence of fascists organize punitive expeditions abroad to attack identity militants demonstrating peacefully, demonstrating a pathological violent impulse. No well-balanced person would hammer strangers in the skull if they were not suffering from mental distress. These heroes who attack an unarmed opponent with bars ten to one, as in the infamous “anni di piombo” [“years of lead” literally the years of the communist terrorism in Italy, ‘70-’80 of the past century – Translator’s note], are paranoid in the grip of omnipotence delirium. They feel empowered to punish at will those who think differently from them and arrogantly claim not to be punished for their absurd violence. They strike out in cold blood without any awareness of the damage they can inflict, people devoid of any moral rule, any sense of humanity.

Unmotivated violence is all that is left to the orphans of the Red Brigades, to terrorists who prefer physical abuse to the dynamics of ideological confrontation. In the absence of driving ideas, of alternative visions to consumerism, of shared programs, the only glue that holds together forces as diverse and distant as conservative centrist parties and revolutionary groups with the System's permission, is anti-fascism. More than a hundred years after the founding of the Fasci di Combattimento [the very first Fascist groups that became soon the Italian Fascist Party – Translator’s note] in the 1920s and the demise of the Regime at the end of the Second World War, anti-fascists are still raging against a ghost kept alive artificially to have an enemy.

The “construction of the enemy”, a dynamic studied in social psychology, is the current and up-to-date form of the scapegoat, which in antiquity made it possible to channel discontent and anger towards a defenseless victim. From a historical point of view, it is impossible to revitalize what must be consigned to History, which is done with documents and monuments with which historiography is written. “History always repeats itself twice: the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce”, the aphorism attributed to Marx ruthlessly captures the current situation. Farce is just ridiculous, tragedy has light and shade in its grandeur, while forgery is pathetic and out-of-date Antifascism is blatantly a farce. It would be interesting to ask the antifascists of the third millennium where the black shirts with fezzes and boots lurk, where they see labour corporations, reclamation of swampy areas and the lira at ninety. If they have ever heard of these political and civil works, they have certainly forgotten them.

The anthropological and cultural characteristics of the demonized twenty years are not to be found in the liberal-conservative parties and the governments they express, which have nothing social or national about them. All the parties call themselves democrats and mercatists, clones of those in the USA that have nothing to do with the National Revolutions of the 20th century. Social hatred serves to consolidate the group, to give political motivation to those who no longer recognize themselves in anything but a sterile struggle for something that is not there. This political dynamic is part of the manipulation technique used to impose control and make people accept the worst falsifications of reality. The monopoly of hatred is yet another prevarication of conservative forces, a dangerous mystification to cover up wrongdoings and lies. Better to be hated than to provoke indifference like the imaginary Left that has to invent a non-existent bogeyman to have a reason to be.

Source: https://identitario.org

Translation by Costantino Ceoldo