Conspiracy theory

Conspiracy is presented by the media as a ridiculously stupid opinion professed by groups of “minus habens” [natural born idiot]. Of course, this is a carefully thought-out presentation, precisely because it sounds ridiculously stupid, by marketing and advertising experts. Questions like this immediately arise: is it possible that a large group of people can keep a world-class subversive plan secret by making fun of people and covering up the truth without anyone denouncing them and discovering their game? With all the information circulating today (sic)? With all the associations of all kinds that exist, the political opponents and the technical means available? Answer: I don't know, all that remains is to go and see, if it really happens, it means that it is possible. But, of course, these are only rhetorical questions. Nobody really wants to go and see. To the most it seems impossible because it is presented as impossible. That's enough. The media count on it. They also have an effective disgusting system that they always use: they go to look for or even create picturesque characters, authentic and less authentic, who think or pretend to be custodians of the Great Truth: esoterists, metaphysicians, spiritualists, religious, mystics, simple exalted ones. The more bizarre the theory supported by these, the more suitable it is to be approached with very concrete and solidly argued hypotheses, but, alas, in contrast with official truths, in order to discredit them. Then they continue: here, do you see who these conspiracy theorists really are? Flat-earthers, people who believe in the Epiphany. With this little game, everything that really differs from the average television vulgate is presented by the diligent main stream as a “conspiracy theory” and therefore stupid, unsustainable, impossible, worthy of giggles and mockery by self-styled experts enlisted for this purpose.

Some say that Osama Bin Laden was not killed at all during a raid in Pakistan by the heroic Navy Seals made in the interval between one show and another and then buried in the sea with “Islamic rite”, but he was long dead by illness? For the main stream it clearly gives license to wearing tinfoil hats in order to prevent the gray aliens from Aldebaran camouflaged by Mormons from reading your mind. Imagine, if it was true it would have come out! It would have known! With all the investigative journalists who are ready to split the hair in four! Does anyone suggest that the martyr Regeni [1] was not just any student as the media repeated with dull insistence, but a Western agent on a mission to Egypt, probably on behalf of British agencies? It's pretty much the same as assuming that the pyramids were built by the aliens of Betelgeuse (by the way, why exactly by the aliens of Betelgeuse and not of Capella? Look, no doubt: it says in the apocalypse. Really? Does the apocalypse mention Betelgeuse? How silly you are, it does not directly say Betelgeuse, but you have to know how to read the symbols! Ah, here, I understand). And you, gullible public, do you want to be fooled by these tinfoil hats? Do you want to be fooled by these crazy guys? But stay with us as we are information professionals! We will never deceive you! Or at least we will never tell you such silly things! In fact, if we even superficially examine the official versions of a couple of episodes among the most cited by conspiracy theories, we immediately realize that they present truly incontrovertible and self-evident truths.

In November 1963, President Kennedy was killed on live television by some rifle shots as he was moving in an open car through the cheering crowd in Dallas, Texas. He was struck by an isolated killer, a former Marines named Lee Oswald, alone and for more or less psychopathic personal reasons, who fired from the distant window of a book store where he worked, with an old rifle which was then abandoned on the spot. Kennedy was not yet dead, that the killer had already been identified, the same day he was arrested in a cinema where he had taken refuge (it seems without paying the ticket), after also killing a policeman on the street who, apparently, recognized him. It is not known what films they made. Questioned by the police, he denied both crimes, and asserted that his role was only that of a scapegoat. Two days after his arrest, during a transfer, while handcuffed and escorted by police officers, he was himself shot dead, also live on television, by another isolated killer, who had mingled with the crowd, a guy named Jack Ruby, always obviously motivated by more or less psychopathic personal motivations. Tell me how it might come to anyone's mind, if not a paranoid flat-earther, that there was a conspiracy. The whole story is so linear, clear and without shadows that the truth is proved by itself. It is clear that the two killers acted alone and for personal reasons. The conspiracy theory was clearly invented only because Kennedy was the president of the United States and there was a way to become famous by small talk, but any reasonable person, after considering the facts, understands perfectly well that to assume that there was an organization that decided, planned and carried out Kennedy's death for political and not psychopathic purposes, is a hypothesis as unlikely as a snowfall in Rome in the middle of August. Or, if you prefer, as much as the Betelgeuse aliens.

The attack in New York in September 2001. A group of about twenty Arab terrorists of various nationalities is sent to the United States by a terrorist organization of Islamic extremists called Al Quaeda and led by Osama Bin Laden, a Saudi billionaire who was already a supporter of the CIA in various secret missions and whose family is a friend of that of President Bush. At the time, Bin Laden wa hidden somewhere in the Middle East, with the task of carrying out a complex, spectacular and extremely difficult attack. To this end, some of the attackers attended amateur piloting courses for small tourist aircraft, then, at the right moment, they simultaneously seize four large airliners that have taken off at different American airports and hijack two of them over central New York, and two on downtown Washington. They kill the pilots and thanks to the technical skills acquired in the amateur courses, they directly take the controls of the aircraft (by the way, have you ever seen the control panel of a modern airliner?), And with a spectacular and difficult maneuver, they crash them in half-height on the twin towers of the World Trade Center, one each. A few hours later, the towers curl up on themselves in a ruinous collapse that reaches the ground and leaves nothing standing. A real demolition that not even the palaces of Dresden after the famous bombing. A third skyscraper nearby, built like the other two with a steel structure in the seventies, despite not having been hit by anything, still collapses on itself in apparent free fall. Of the two planes bound for Washington, one crashes to the ground on the way because the terrorists have in the meantime been overwhelmed by the passengers, a circumstance that is deduced from phone calls to family members made in flight by some passengers, the other, always with a difficult and spectacular maneuver close to the ground that comes to knock down the street lamps, manages to crash into the Pentagon, partially destroying the first outer circle of a wing of the building. Terrorists and passengers, all perish in the crashes. None of the aircraft are intercepted by the US air defense. Within 24 hours, all the names of the hijackers were already known. What do you say? What could be suspicious in a story like this? What is surprising? Do you find something strange in it? Well, it goes without saying that there has been a lot of progress in special effects since Kennedy.

It therefore appears more than natural that any hypothesis that contradicts even in a single point such precise, solid and incontrovertible official reconstruction, has been scornfully and scornfully defined as “conspiracy theory” by most of the media and by all institutional commentators. In truth, there was no lack of different versions, just as there were also authoritative dissenting voices, and people who do not believe in the narrative ended up being many, however the official versions remained untouchable, however unlikely they are to an analysis just less than distracted. And even today that is the truth that the authorities never dreamed of changing. This in spite of the alleged impossibility of keeping a subversive plan secret among many people for a sufficiently long time. Is it possible then? Yes, it is possible. Nobody denounces it? On the contrary, many do, only it is useless.

The current global pandemic clearly looks something similar, but on a much larger scale: guys, progress is unstoppable! Even today, incredible as it may be, the official reconstruction of the facts continues to convince the majority of the population who believe in it, despite the fact that it changes constantly.

Do you remember? Here:

A couple of weeks of closure and we save Easter. Just to flatten the curve. Masks are not needed. Masks are indispensable. Two more weeks and let's save Christmas (by the way, can we still say “Christmas”?) With 60% of vaccinated, we achieve herd immunity. With 70% of the vaccinated, we achieve herd immunity. Eighty percent. Ninety. One hundred. One hundred and ten. Vaccines stop the infection. Vaccines do not stop the infection, but they mitigate the disease. Herd immunity cannot be achieved because vaccines do not stop the infection. There are no cures, only “acetaminophen and watchful waiting”, then the vaccine will save us. Hydroxychloroquine kills. Hydroxychloroquine has been used for decades against malaria. Vaccines save you from hospitalization. Even vaccinated people can end up in hospital and die. But the unvaccinated more. A vaccine, and we are out of the epidemic. It takes two doses. It takes three doses. It takes four doses. It takes one dose every year. Every six months. After five months, the third dose is good. The vaccinated do not infect others. Vaccinated people can also infect, but have a lower viral load. The vaccinated have the same viral load as the unvaccinated. Laissez-passer are used to reduce infections. Laissez-passer are not used to reduce infections, but to force people to get vaccinated. Children do not get sick and do not transmit the disease. Indeed, perhaps they transmit it, but only to the grandfather. Even children can get sick. Children are at high risk: they must be vaccinated immediately. Even the recovered must be vaccinated. Do you want to put the effectiveness of the vaccine against that of natural immunity? It would be safer to vaccinate even the dead. Vaccines have no adverse effects. Only Astra Zeneca has. Adverse effects are very rare. Oh well, some mild myocarditis, but little stuff. It seems some embolism, but in negligible percentages. And in the long run? Nothing, nothing in the long run. In short, the long run has not yet existed, how do we know? It can be hypothesized that the preparations could have oncogenic action, but it is only a hypothesis. Maybe they could weaken the immune system, but it's not proven. An ADE-like effect? But I don't believe it. And go away.

It should be noted that historically an epidemic does not last more than two years. Two years have gone, but this time it seems it has some valid medical and advertising aid. Of course, if after all this, the majority still believe in television, it is difficult to assume that they will soon stop having faith, they will probably believe it as long as the media continues to tell them that it is true, or until they are called to verify for themselves… They will believe it as long as it is important that they believe it, then everything will dissolve into a sea of ​​days and bullshits, as happened for the two events described above. Perhaps someone will even discover that the pandemic was triggered by a virus of the green reptilians of Deneb, or by the Templars who have kept them for centuries inside the Holy Grail buried in Montsegur, but it is doubtful that, at least officially, the truth will ever come to floats completely.

At this point I wonder: but are we really sure that the assassination of Julius Caesar was the result of a senatorial plot and not rather the insane gesture of an isolated murderer who acted for personal reasons of a more or less psychopathic nature? Listen to me: conspiracies don't exist.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Giulio_Regeni

As a site of alternative but serious counter-information, from the real beginning of the epidemic in Italy, ComeDonChisciotte offered and still offers a different voice, compared to the official one, and it is still trying to wake up Italian people sleeping dangerously on the government’s mistakes.

https://www.geopolitica.ru/en/article/alternative-information-italy-comedonchisciotte-case

*****************************************************

Original column by Nestor Halak:

https://comedonchisciotte.org/teoria-del-complotto/

Translation by Costantino Ceoldo