America’s Forever Wars

23.08.2024
Over two decades have passed since the September 11 attacks, yet the United States remains locked in a series of conflicts that show no sign of ending. What began as a focused campaign against terrorism has gradually expanded into a far-reaching, unending struggle—one that has reshaped not only America’s foreign policy but also its role on the global stage. This "Forever War," initially directed at eliminating terrorist threats, has morphed into a broader, more dangerous crusade, where enemies multiply, and battlefronts shift with alarming regularity. From the deserts of the Middle East to the steppes of Eastern Europe, and now toward the Indo-Pacific, the U.S. seems poised to drag the world into yet another catastrophic conflict—this time with China.
 
The U.S. War on Terror, launched in response to the horrific events of 9/11, was initially seen as a necessary measure to protect the homeland and eliminate the terrorist networks responsible. But as Dexter Filkins eloquently captures in his book "Forever War: America's Unending Conflict with Itself," the mission quickly expanded beyond its original scope. The U.S. did not stop at targeting those directly responsible for the attacks; it broadened its efforts to encompass entire nations, and eventually, the religion of Islam itself.
 
Afghanistan and Iraq became the primary battlegrounds of this expanded conflict. However, the logic driving the war ensured it didn’t end there. What started as a fight against specific terrorist groups turned into a war against the Middle East itself as if the entire region was a threat to be neutralized. This expansive and ill-defined mission has led to endless interventions, with devastating consequences. We’ve seen the rise of ISIS, the collapse of Libya, the horror of the Syrian civil war, and ongoing chaos in Yemen—all stemming from a strategy that seems to generate more enemies than it eliminates.
 
This wide-ranging definition of the enemy has trapped the U.S. in a cycle of violence, ensuring that the conflict continues indefinitely. By treating entire regions and cultures as adversaries, the U.S. has found itself in a perpetual state of war, with no clear exit strategy in sight.
 
As the Middle East continues to burn, the U.S. has shifted its focus to new fronts. Russia, asserting its influence and security concerns in Ukraine, has taken decisive actions, and the United States, reviving Cold War-era animosities, has funneled extensive military and financial resources into Ukraine, further escalating tensions and contributing to the instability in the region. This new chapter in the Forever War reflects a broader strategic goal: to contain and weaken any nation that challenges U.S. dominance on the global stage.
 
However, this strategy is fraught with peril. John Mearsheimer has argued that the U.S. bears significant responsibility for the crisis in Ukraine. By expanding NATO eastward and encouraging Ukraine to align with the West, the U.S. effectively provoked Russia into taking aggressive action. The result is a bloody, protracted conflict that has drawn the U.S. into yet another seemingly endless war.
But the implications of this new front go beyond Ukraine. The U.S.’s aggressive stance toward Russia has set the stage for a broader confrontation with China, a nation that has been quietly building its strength and influence while the U.S. remains bogged down in the Middle East and Eastern Europe.
 
China’s leadership has been closely monitoring America’s actions, fully aware of the U.S.’s tendency toward perpetual warfare. Unlike the U.S., China has avoided overt military interventions, choosing instead to expand its influence through diplomacy and economic power. Initiatives like the Belt and Road are part of a broader strategy to create a network of allies and economic dependencies that can counterbalance American power.
 
China’s support for Russia in the Ukraine conflict, as well as its diplomatic efforts in the Middle East, are calculated moves within this strategy. By backing Russia, China aims to weaken the U.S.’s position in Europe while also preparing for the day when it might face a direct challenge from the U.S. itself. In the Middle East, China has sought to play the role of peacemaker, most notably with the recent Beijing Declaration, which aimed to mediate the conflict in Gaza. However, these efforts have faced a serious setback due to the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh in Iran—a stark reminder that the U.S. and its allies are not prepared to allow China to expand its influence unchecked.
 
China understands that the U.S.’s Forever War is creeping closer to its borders. Tensions in the South China Sea, ongoing trade disputes, and the U.S.’s increasing military presence in the Indo-Pacific all point to a potential confrontation. For China, supporting Russia, Iran, and other U.S. adversaries is not just about weakening American influence—it’s about preparing for the day when the Forever War targets Beijing.
 
The trajectory of U.S. foreign policy suggests that the concept of the Forever War is not going away. Instead, it’s evolving, with new enemies and new battlefields. As Mearsheimer and others have pointed out, this approach is not just unsustainable—it’s deeply dangerous.
 
A potential conflict with China could be the most catastrophic phase of the Forever War yet. Unlike the wars in the Middle East or the conflict in Ukraine, a war with China would involve two nuclear-armed superpowers, each with vast economic and military resources. The consequences would be devastating, not just for the U.S. and China, but for the entire world.
 
U.S.’s approach to China, much like its approach to Russia and the Middle East, lacks coherence and is primarily driven by a desire to maintain global dominance. This mindset has led to a series of strategic blunders, from the overextension of military resources to the alienation of potential allies. The idea of a multipolar world—where power is shared among several major nations—is something the U.S. has struggled to accept. Yet, this is increasingly becoming the reality of the global order. The U.S. must abandon the cycle of perpetual conflict and embrace the realities of a multipolar world. Diplomatic engagement and multilateralism are essential to avoid a catastrophic clash with China. The choices made now will define the future of global stability and peace.